Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for August, 2008

Last Monday on the 16th Street Mall, at lunchtime. A nice sunny day, not as hot as August can be here. My usual lunchtime restaurant was half-deserted at 11:40, although on a usual day it’s getting pretty full by then:

However, outside on the Mall more than the usual lunchtime crowds were out, because this was Day One of the Democratic National Convention and the joint was jumping.

I noticed that the heavy masonry trash cans along the Mall had been replaced by lightweight cardboard boxes with plastic bags.

People were cheerful, hawkers were out in force. Some with permits and I’m sure many without. Some buskers were out, including one man playing his trumpet. I’d stopped to take his picture when I heard someone say something about the Mall shuttle buses being stopped, then heard a booming noise in the background.

I looked up and saw a banner approaching from the Civic Center end of the Mall. People were marching in the traffic lane toward me.

So I took some snaps and then stepped aside to watch the protest parade pass.

It didn’t take long. There weren’t very many marchers, and several of them seemed to be multitasking anyway.

By the digital time metadata in the pictures I took, it was two minutes and thirty seconds between the first snapshot from a block away and this picture of the mounted patrol bringing up the rear at the end of the protest parade.

In the meantime, the horn player – in the turquoise and white shirt above – had stopped playing while the little protest parade passed by, and turned to a new place in his music, an interesting counterpoint to the passing parade.

It’s OK, this is America. That’s what happens here.

In broad daylight. Out in public. On a nice sunny day. The outraged protesters make their point and march on. The trumpet player lifts up his horn and plays again – “I Worship You, Almighty God” – after they pass by.

The festival continues. I go back to work.

Read Full Post »

I have a very low threshold for political correctness. A blogger arriving in Denver last week to cover the DNC for Pacifica Radio, posted the photo above of DNC volunteers at the Denver airport, and her comment sent me right into “Flo mode” which if you don’t know already, means I cop an attitude worthy of a very annoyed truck stop waitress and snarl “Kiss my grits.” And then I proceed to get actually hostile. Bloggie-poo wrote:

I have to admit that the welcoming committee pictured above hardly reflects the diversity that I see on the floor today: more than half the delegates are women; one in every four is African American, 11 percent are Latino, four percent are Asian-American Pacific Islander; another four percent associate with a disability and six percent identify as LGBT. 

Golly. I’m sure that in San Francisco they would never have allowed any group of volunteers to gather to offer to help people, except in properly assorted types and numbers. But this is Colorado. We’re not as politically pure.

We still kind of think three friendly faces are, well, three friendly faces. Without consideration of race, religion, age, national origin, disability, gender, marital status, sexual orientation, technological sophistication, political affiliation, or economic status.

The folks in the orange T-shirts volunteered their time – and the resources to get to the airport and home again which usually means gas and parking money – to greet people coming to the DNC and help them navigate the airport from arrival to baggage claim to ground transportation. (Edited to add: Those in the picture were only three among hundreds of such volunteers, who helped both at the airport and downtown.)

And a snotty blogger just had to slam this random lot of them for not being a politically correct assortment.

Anyway, I doubt that she talked with them and went through her checklist. Maybe one of them ‘associates with a disability’ (Lord, a whole new straight line!), or only one of them is heterosexual?

This calls out for Cranky Prof’s articulate billingsgate.

I am not worthy.

Read Full Post »

Red-lining the red ink

I am not (and never have been) teacher material. At least two generations of Americans have been spared years of awful classroom experiences because I figured that out when in college and didn’t even seriously consider getting a teaching credential.

And at that place and time, a young woman graduating with a BA in History was semi-expected to go into teaching if she wasn’t going to grad school or getting married. (To be fair, though, by the time I graduated, the getting married part didn’t stop us from making plans to work or go for another degree.)

I admire and respect good teachers, at all levels.  And I often read the blogs of some talented folks who teach college students. Today one of them – again – astounded me with a dispatch from the trenches:

The latest soul-crushing endeavor by our goblinesque administration — specifically, the newly-minted Ed.D:

We are no longer allowed to use red pens to correct papers, because students have an inherently negative reaction to red pen. In using red, we’re cutting off the lines of communication, because students shut down emotionally, and can’t see past all of the red to the truth of our commentary.

Red pen renders our constructive criticism in to plain, negative criticism.

Red is an ANGRY color, and we should never be angry with our students. Rather, we should be guiding them gently in to their impending adulthood with firm, polite correction — much as a gentle breeze puffs the small sailboat into safe harbor.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Cranky Prof goes on to write that until now she’s never paid that much attention to the color of ink she uses on papers, just using whatever she has. But now, well, read it for yourself.

I’m having nasty fun imagining the disciplinary memo that EdD would issue to profs who persist in using red ink. Snort, snicker, snort.

Read Full Post »

I’m figuring out the logistics of getting to and from my downtown office this coming Monday through Wednesday. Because as I may have mentioned a time or ten here the Democratic National Convention will be in town. Along with the media and the tens and tens of thousands of demonstrators and marchers and protesters that we are constantly told are flocking here as we speak. My office is in a building located at the staging area and starting point of daily parades (as in demonstration/protest type, not the Shriners) through downtown. The City designated the route a few months ago and handed out permits to applicants. From 10 am to 3 pm Sunday through Wednesday (or maybe through Thursday), it’s gonna be crowded out there on the streets.

The media hype is growing by the minute, and it’s only Friday afternoon. The DNC opened the doors to show off the remodeled interior of the Pepsi Center, and everybody’s all ooh and aah which really brings home how much this is show biz. Some of these reporters are going to be hyperventilating by Tuesday afternoon if this pace keeps up.

In the meantime, a little sanity is to be had on the innernets. The folks at FactCheck.org have looked into Barack Obama’s birth certificate apparently in response to allegations that it’s a fake and he wasn’t really born in the USA  They report here that it’s for real and yes he was born in the US.  The report concludes with a copy of a birth announcement printed in the newspaper in Honolulu in 1961: a son was born on August 4 to Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, with their home address also listed.  

FactCheck.org concludes:

Of course, it’s distantly possible that Obama’s grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.

Good lord, could common sense be breaking out?

On second thought:  Nah.

Read Full Post »

Scary

I’m looking at all the toys I’ve provided to Jasper. Because I just read this blog post about terrible injuries to a dog from getting his tongue trapped in a toy ball.

So far, I’ve found one toy that could be dangerous in the same way as the one in the story:  a single opening in which a doggie tongue might be stuck, without any other opening for air, so that a vacuum could be created to keep the tongue trapped. (However it’s not the same type of toy that injured that blogger’s dog.) That toy is now out of play unless I’m playing with him at the time. Maybe I’m overreacting. So be it.

And the little guy has *lots* of toys anyway.

Read Full Post »

Man, am I ever sick of those political commercials on TV. And we’re not nearly done yet. For a nice change:

cat
more cat pictures

Read Full Post »

Some when they arrive, and others when they leave.

H/T to CrankyProf for the link to this obit. Looks like truth may have trumped conventions for once.

It’s here if the original link won’t work:  frankobit08-2

UPDATE on August 18:  I checked the original link to the obit, and it appears the obit may have been pulled from the newspaper’s website. I don’t know if the obit was published in the print edition of the newspaper or just online. It is harsh. I have now redacted the decedent’s name and the names of her family members from my pdf version, out of privacy concerns.

Read Full Post »

Uncle Bobby’s Wedding

Uncle Bobby’s Wedding is a short children’s book in which a little girl worries about “losing” her favorite Uncle Bobby because he’s getting married. It’s on the shelves of the Douglas County public libraries. Dougco is the southernmost county in the sprawling Denver Metro area, and at least until recently one of the fastest-growing (as to population) counties in the USA. It’s affluent, super-suburban, and deeply Republican. 

Dougco’s public library system is headed by Jamie Larue, who also blogs at myliblog.

I found his blog today, and am just blown away by the wonderful, thoughtful letter – printed in full in this blog post – he wrote to a woman who objected to the library’s having Uncle Bobby’s Wedding on its shelves in the children’s section. She objected because Uncle Bobby’s marriage is to another man.

I urge you to read Jamie Larue’s letter to that woman if it’s all you read today. It’s a wonderful statement of what public libraries are about, among other things.

Sadly, he now reports more negative feedback. Which looks like an organized “ban the book” campaign. Some people just don’t get it. 

Best wishes to Mr. Larue as he deals with this, and to the Dougco library board of trustees who no doubt will be pushed and lobbied and harangued by the bookburner fringe over this.

Read Full Post »

Hang Up and Drive

Note:  I tried to post this video clip to this blog at least two weeks ago, without success.  Tried more than once.  Nothing showed up.  This morning, much to my surprise, it showed up – in triplicate.

Here’s what I wrote at the time:  I looked at this book  - Brain Rules, by John Medina – while browsing in a book store yesterday. This morning I’ve ordered a copy from amazon.com. Not the Kindle version, because it doesn’t come with the DVD.

 

Read Full Post »

The Descent of Man

Through my Kindle I’m discovering the International Herald Tribune. My trial subscription has convinced me to continue.  I enjoy reading it Monday through Saturday. I know the IHT is online too, where many articles can be read for free. But the point of the Kindle is that I read it when I’m not at the computer. 

The IHT often covers stories that the mainstream US media passes up, and presents points of view we don’t see here in The Magic Kingdom (I really do fear we are becoming a wholly-owned and cleverly managed subsidiary of the Disney Companies).  

My imagination is not captured by stories about privileged white guys cluttering up the environment by trying to scale the world’s highest mountains, so I read rather quickly this opinion piece about the latest bunch to kill themselves and others on K2. (If the link doesn’t work I’m reprinting it below the fold.) And then the next day or so, I read this letter to the editor which so sums up my feelings I just have to share it.

Drama on the Mountain

Regarding the article “The descent of man” by Maurice Isserman (Views, Aug. 11): When reading of yet another Himalayan mountaineering disaster my main feeling is one of irritation. Can’t these people try to push their personal boundaries doing something useful – like working for the Red Cross or Doctors Without Borders – rather than going on an ego-trip that endangers innocent people, pollutes the environment, distresses family and friends, and altogether wastes lots of money?

Josephine Bersee, Hong Kong

It’s not like these twits are discovering anything previously unknown to our society, or mapping the world, or participating in important research. Nope. They are just playing an expensive, dangerous, and destructive game. Another extreme sport, about as edifying as professional wrestling or those caged fights in arenas.

The opinion piece is here:

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Hoot

Over at bizzyville, Suzanne has a new puppy, Tallulah. An utterly adorable little ball of fur, of course.

This morning, the Other Dog in the house is heard from - here.  Just go read it.  You can thank me later, after you quit laughing.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.